As
of today, the Raelians are a population of more than 55,000 people.
This means a lot of people. In any population that increases there
are a percentage of criminals, mentally deranged, and sick people.
This is true in all communities whether Muslim, Jewish, or Christian.
But when there are cases in a religious minority
that come to light, the society always attempts to emphasize the
fact that the criminal belongs to this minority religion. This,
for instance, was done in the past particularly with Jews. Many
slaughters took place following an assault on a child by a member
of the Jewish religion. People were eager to encourage the population
to hate all the Jewish communities because of a crime committed
by only one of their members.
There are psychiatric asylums full of mentally sick
people and jails full of criminals where Jews, Christians, and Muslims
are equally represented. And there will unfortunately be as many
among the Raelians. Just as there are criminals and rapists among
Muslims, Jews, and Christians, there will also be Raelians representing
this category of people. But the fact is that when a member of one
of these majority traditional religions commits a criminal act,
no one questions their religious affiliation. No media would dare
write: "A Jew condemned for having sex with a minor" because
it would instantly result in a general and justified protest by
associations who fight racial hatred and anti-Semitism. But when
it involves a Raelian, the media, without any scruples, don't hesitate
to mention the religious affiliation of the accused trying to sully
an entire community and conspicuously encourage hatred. A recent
newspaper article published in "Agence France Presse"
proves this point by reporting the condemnation of 3 young Raelians
who engaged in sexual acts with a minor. When a 19-year old Christian
male dates a consenting 16-year old girl, (which legally speaking
is also considered 'having sex with a minor'), there is no condemnation.
There is only condemnation if he is Raelian, of course, otherwise
there wouldn't be any room left in the jails!
If a mother calls you to report that a Raelian has committed an
illegal act against her daughter (a minor), you must not justify
yourself but instead always reply: "If there are Raelians committing
illegal acts, they must be reported to the local authorities and
let the judicial system take control" and add: "I don't
know why you are telling me this. I have nothing to do with this
and it's none of my business. If you think that a Raelian has committed
illegal acts, report him to the local authorities and take him to
court." We must absolutely stay away from justifications that
could potentially turn against our community. We must also be mindful
that such calls from mothers may be taped (although taping a conversation
without consent is illegal) and any justification on our part could
be interpreted as a condemnation of illegal behaviors from Raelians.
So we must tirelessly repeat the previous statements
without elaborating unnecessarily. Then add: "If a Christian
male had had this behavior with your daughter, would you call the
regional Bishop or the Pope? So I don't know why you bother me with
this. Raelians are adults. Free, and responsible for their actions
outside the frame of our activities and these actions are none of
our business." Any other attitude, such as listening to upset
parents with compassion, can only put us in a situation where there
is a sort of bondage in the sense of spiritual responsibility. We
must not enter the ring. Our answers must be clear, cut and dry,
and repeated tirelessly: "Raelians are responsible for their
behavior and so should the Christians and Jews."
This 'rule' is applicable for any crime or offence.
If the accused had stolen the neighbor's car, the neighbor would
not be calling the Continental Guide
so why is it only when
sex is involved? Moreover, the call itself is a way to insinuate
that our religion is responsible for this person's behavior. We
must never agree to these kinds of insinuations and always react
with extreme firmness by mentioning the example of the stolen. "
If this sounds illegal to you, call the authorities. Would you call
me if he had stolen your car? So why call me for this? In fact,
I find your call very insulting to our religion. If a Raelian commits
illegal acts, take him to court. I don't even want to hear about
it. You would not call your Bishop or the Pope if a Christian had
robbed you, so thank you for not disturbing me with this call which
implies that my religion or I am involved. We condemn any illegal
activity whatsoever. Period. I have nothing else to tell you. Please
contact the authorities."
To protect our respectability means not to argue
but to tell people to deal with the authorities when they think
an illegal activity has been committed. Without discussions or getting
into the justifications. We have so many other infinitely more important
things to accomplish!
Some could say: "Why has RAEL created NOPEDO
to denounce pedophile Catholic priests on one hand, and on the other
tells Raelian officials not to listen to parents who complain about
the behavior of some Raelians who commit sexual acts with children."
The difference is enormous. This actually has to do with promptly
advising parents to use the judicial system for reporting any illegal
acts to the authorities. This is something that the Catholic clergy
has never done. The Catholic Clergy has always covered and protected
pedophile priests, so numerous that individual cases cannot be sited.
This will never happen with Raelians. All members of the structure
have the responsibility, if they witness illegal acts involving
children, to denounce the person or persons involved in such reprehensible
acts and to report the incident to the authorities. We will never
try to cover or protect pedophiles that would try to hide among
us. Considering the importance of our mission, it is our duty to
report, without hesitation, to the authorities the persons involved
in these acts that we categorically condemn. This does not mean
to punish them, because it is not about punishment. It is to first
protect potential victims and second to treat the offenders for
their illness since pedophilia is a mental disorder. Let it be said
and repeated: "Pedophiles are not welcomed within our organization."
And if there are any, we must hunt them down and denounce them.
The Messages that we have the duty to spread are too beautiful to
let our organization be sullied by the behavior of a few mentally
deranged. When one of our officials files a complaint against the
activities of a pedophile, we officially prove to all the slanderers
that we do not tolerate this type of behavior.
This applies obviously to pedophiles
and we
must define what pedophilia is: Sexuality with children. Pre-pubescent
human beings, not adolescents but children. We cannot consider an
18-20 year-old young man who dates a young 16 year-old woman as
a pedophile. In this case, no condemnation applies since it has
to do with the love between two consenting beings, even if current
laws consider this as 'sex with a minor'. Personally, this is something
that I would never report and I do not encourage anyone to do so.
The fact is that there are millions of teenagers in the world in
this same age group who date and no one complains
except if
they are members of a minority religion. In fact, in Canada (like
France), where sexual maturity is 15 years old for girls and 16
years old for boys, the judge always looks at the interest and stability
of the minor when there is a complaint regarding the involvement
of an adult with a minor. That is, he verifies if the minor sincerely
loves the adult, and, if it's the case, does not go forward with
the complaint. Such legal proceedings, in a courtroom, could undoubtedly
traumatize the life of an adolescent whom really is in love with
an adult. In other words, Canadian magistrates respect love. This
is obviously not the case in France where we have recently heard
of young female adolescents being pressured, in vain, by the French
justice and authorities to blame the young adults that they loved
for having sex with them. And even if in court, to the great displeasure
of the Republic's prosecutor, these young women stood up for their
loved ones. These young adults were heavily condemned to prison
terms without parole. It is obvious, in such a case, that the interests
of the young 16 and 17 year old women were not considered but that
the emphasis was on the 'cult' rather than the future of these adolescents
who would get scarred for life. Alas, not everyone has the fortune
to live in a country respectful of individuals and the psychological
equilibrium of teenagers such as in Canada. We can write all the
laws we want, it has been scientifically established that even if
it is forbidden by law, more than 50% of teenagers less than 15
years of age, in some countries, have already lived their first
sexual experience. And the age limit continues to decrease. Biological
realities escape human laws.
We can always write a law to forbid the rain from
falling, but it will still rain. What we need, like all the sex
therapists around the world have stated, is to make sexual education
courses in schools more elaborate so that these experiences do not
lead to pregnancies that are never desired and to encourage the
use of condoms. This is what our teachings recommend when we talk
about teaching sensuality as well as sexuality to adolescents. It
definitely does not encourage pedophilia or incest. When these topics
are discussed by sex therapists they all agree that it is science-related.
But if WE say it, it's considered an encouragement to pedophilia!
We must fight against this ill-intentioned mental confusion. And
the only way to fight against it is to not tolerate any pedophile
in our organization and to report them all, just like we strive
to denounce pedophile Catholic priests. We can criticize them only
if we have swept thoroughly in front of our own door. This is what
we do and must continue to do with vigilance!
Rael
|